Stelmach’s message to Morton: Be careful what you wish for!

Hurdles? Morton should expect ’em! Below: Ted Morton, Ed Stelmach.

There can be no love lost between Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach and Finance Minister Ted Morton, the man whose political brinksmanship is being credited with precipitating the premier’s unexpected announcement Tuesday that he is about to step down.

Reading between the lines of the masses of uninformative and often speculative media coverage of the past 24 hours, a clear theme emerges: It’s as if Premier Stelmach were saying, “OK, Ted, I’m going to let you have your wish. Sure hope you like it!”

Dr. Morton – the self-described “liberal’s nightmare, a right-winger with a PhD” – represents the privatize-everything market fundamentalist branch of the Alberta Progressive Conservative Party.

By contrast, Mr. Stelmach, while no New Democrat, represents the party’s big-tent, politically pragmatic, progressive Conservative tradition.

As Labour Minister Thomas Lukaszuk, a Stelmach protégé, stated: “There’s a reason this party is called the Progressive Conservative Party, and not the Conservative Party. We need to balance fiscal responsibility with our obligations to Albertans.”

That wouldn’t be Dr. Morton’s opinion, of course. As a highly ideological finance minister, he demanded brutal and painful cuts in the next budget, the better to compete with the neo-conservative vision of the Wildrose Alliance under Danielle Smith.

As a more pragmatic politician, there was no way Mr. Stelmach was going to subscribe to the What-Big-Teeth-You-Have-Danielle School of Political Strategy. The premier wasn’t about to take the chance of destroying the province’s economy and driving away his party’s centrist core to satisfy Dr. Morton’s notions of ideological purity.

According to several media accounts, Dr. Morton went to Mr. Stelmach with an ultimatum: Let me bring down the budget I want or I’ll quit and eight of my supporters in caucus will resign and sit as independents – then Danielle will bring you down!

Instead of firing Dr. Morton, as he was clearly entitled, Mr. Stelmach’s response was to pull the plug on politics. This decision astounded almost everyone, friend and foe alike – except, presumably, his wife Marie, who has been urging him for months to quit for the sake of his family and his health. (Not to mention his financial health – he’ll pocket close to a million dollars in “transitional allowances.”)

So Mr. Stelmach gave the ambitious Dr. Morton his wish for another crack at the job he’s coveted since he lost the party leadership contest to the premier in 2006. Remember, Dr. Morton surpassed the premier’s support on the first ballot before Mr. Stelmach “came up the middle” to win.

But Premier Stelmach granted his rival’s wish in a way that undermines Dr. Morton’s ambitions.

That’s because Dr. Morton’s second chance will now be on Mr. Stelmach’s terms – that is, according to Mr. Stelmach’s timetable, after Mr. Stelmach’s more moderate budget has been brought down, and without Mr. Stelmach’s sympathy or support in a multitude of tiny ways. In other words, “be careful what you wish for.”

Wildrose Alliance insiders are very likely right when they complain (or in reality rejoice) that the Conservative deck is likely to be stacked against any “truly conservative” leadership candidate – especially if that candidate’s name is Freddy Lee Morton and he’s just made the thin-skinned Mr. Stelmach a very, very unhappy man.

It seems likely that in the upcoming leadership race, there will be several candidates from the party’s more progressive wing arrayed against Dr. Morton, the sole candidate of the far right. That guarantees him a strong position on the first ballot, and a high probability of defeat if there is a second, as happened in 2006.

What’s more, as those Wildrose insiders point out, the Tories’ anyone-can-join-and-vote policy makes it possible for more progressive non-Conservatives of all stripes to influence the leadership vote’s outcome. By his divisive tactics in caucus, Dr. Morton has ensured that the premier – who will stick around for quite a while yet – will strew obstacles in his path.

If Dr. Morton loses the leadership, of course, his core supporters will likely decamp to the Wildrose Alliance while he sits out the election. But the question for the Alliance then will be if enough rank and file Conservative supporters will do the same thing, or if many will migrate back to Alberta’s Natural Governing Party one more time.

If they do, the Wildrose Alliance’s hopes could be dashed.

On the other hand, if Dr. Morton wins, he will be premier for a little time, but not necessarily long enough to implement his Shock Doctrine.

The question in that event is how the progressives among rank-and-file Progressive Conservatives will behave. Will they vote Tory out of long habit, even they distrust their new far-right leader? Will they stay home on voting day and sit on their hands? Or will they vote for the Alberta Party, the Liberals or even the NDP?

Dr. Morton now has some difficult choices to make too: Should he quit cabinet to fight for the leadership and lose his bully pulpit? Should he try to remain as a disloyal and divisive cabinet minister who refuses to deliver his own budget? Should he deliver Mr. Stelmach’s budget and suffer the slings and arrows of Alliance’s outrage?

Ironically, both sides of this debate in Progressive Conservative circles are almost certain to end up using Ms. Smith as their official boogie-person to terrify their opponents.

How will it all end? Alas, as Zhou Enlai, the first premier of the People’s Republic of China, observed of the meaning of the French Revolution of 1789: it’s too soon to tell.

This post also appears on

2 Comments on "Stelmach’s message to Morton: Be careful what you wish for!"

  1. workeradvocate says:

    Morton the charlatan. The libertarian in on 'leave' from his tenured position at a University that the government has significantly underfunded.

  2. Anonymous says:

    Interesting commentary, and I always enjoy reading your articles, hwoever your left Ideological bent rarely enables you to accurately map the Alberta political landscape.

    There are no Neo conservatives in Canada other than Micheal Ignatief, being one of the intellectual brains trusts of this movement in the US.

    Neoconservatives take a more idealist stance on foreign policy; adhere less to social conservatism; have a weaker dedication to the policy of minimal government; and in the past, have been more supportive of the welfare state.

    We don't really have such an animal here in Canada other than the aformentioned Micheal Ignatieff and his support for spreading US democracy abroad by force.

    In any event Albertans will do what they always have done, vote for COMPETENT leadership of a centre right bent. Asside from that there are a few things Albertans won't tolerate.
    1. Politicians Stealing from the public purse
    2. Allowing the government to steal directly from Albertans.

    The Stelmach Tories have no competence, nor will their attempts to expropriate land at will from the public score well at the polls.

    It's too early to tell exactly what will happen, however we do know that their will not be a pc win with 70+% at the polls.


You must be logged in to post a comment.