The ‘Freddy Lee’ Loser Factor: Albertans plain didn’t like a sneak

Finalists Gary Mar, Alison Redford and Doug Horner. The remaining Alberta Progressive Conservative candidates are, well, pretty much exactly as illustrated! Below: Dr. Freddy Lee Morton.

Never mind the winner. Yeah, Calgary lawyer Gary Mar got way more votes than anyone else – enough to clinch it decisively had Alberta’s Conservative leadership ballot count last night been in a normal first-past-the-post election.

But for the moment, there is no official winner, just three contestants still standing in the race to become Alberta’s Next Top Premier ™ and two more weeks in which they need to Keep Calm and Carry On.

The real story today is the loser. Say what you will about Albertans and their one-party ways, they’re true to their principles, and principled Albertans don’t like a sneak.

And let’s face it, by almost any reasonable yardstick of behaviour, that’s exactly what Ted Morton showed himself to be.

This is a guy who in January as minister of finance sandbagged his own premier for personal political advantage. Readers will recall how the American-born far-right ideologue in effect told Premier Ed Stelmach to let him bring down the Shock Doctrine budget he wanted or he’d quit and so would his supporters in caucus.

With the Wildrose Alliance appearing to breathe down the Tories’ necks at the time, such a maneuver would have left the premier with a political crisis he might not have been able to unravel. Disinclined to destroy the province’s economy and drive away his party’s moderate core to satisfy Dr. Morton’s notions of ideological purity, Mr. Stelmach astounded everyone except perhaps his wife Marie and pulled the plug on politics.

The self-described “every liberal’s nightmare, a right-winger with a PhD,” was also the candidate who most radically changed his story about what he believed in. In the 2006 leadership race that Mr. Stelmach won, Dr. Morton did pretty well by acting like the hard-right market fundamentalist he is.

Back then, he advocated a U.S.-style model for health care that would look like the way Albertans get veterinary care for their pets and livestock. This time, all of a sudden he was Medicare’s Greatest Friend. When the Calgary Herald started describing him as public health care’s great defender, many of us thought Alberta Conservatives would be fooled. Evidently not!

But the knife in his political heart was just a little thing: that Freddy Lee government email address he used that was uncovered mid-campaign by CBC investigative journalist Charles Rusnell.

Dr. Morton and his supporters tried to blow it off as something everybody does, and with his legal name to boot. But Albertans saw it for what it was: an intentionally deceptive tactic. And those who voted in the Tory election gave its dismissive and contemptuous defence the hearing it deserved.

Dr. Morton did a lot of work getting ready for this run. He had his supporters lined up and his political ducks in a row. It’s said here that Rick Orman, another candidate who staked out essentially the same economic position, did far better last night than he would have had Dr. Morton not been caught doing business behind a couple of names most Albertans didn’t know were his.

Dr. Morton would have done far better last night if he’d forthrightly owned up to using an email address he shouldn’t have, and apologized for his behaviour. He also would have done better if he’d just admitted he is what he is – a committed free-market foe of public health care. On health care, that’s exactly what he did in 2006, and he made it to the finals.

At this point, Danielle Smith and her far-right Wildrose Party will try to elevate Dr. Morton to sainthood to make their case no “true conservative” can be elected to lead the Conservatives. They’ll also try to use the relatively low turnout yesterday – 35,000 fewer voters than in 2006 – to argue their support is still stronger than polling shows it to be.

Well, good luck to them. A split right wing is never a bad thing. But don’t bet on the right-wing vote being all that spit, or the Wildrose being anything but obliterated, whether Mr. Mar, second-ranked Alison Redford or third-place Doug Horner wins the final battle in two weeks. Both Ms. Redford and Mr. Horner are former ministers in Mr. Stelmach’s cabinet.

And don’t assume that Mr. Mar will emerge the winner just because he has over 4,400 more votes than his two remaining challengers combined – everyone has two more weeks to cook up deals, sell memberships, and book the buses needed to bring their supporters to the polling stations.

But it’s probably safe to conclude that Dr. Frederick Lee Morton, also known as Ted, is finished in Alberta politics. Just guessing, but here’s a prediction he’ll soon retire south of the 49th Parallel, work for a right-wing “think tank,” and live very well indeed, thanks to the public service pension he doesn’t think anyone else should have. Or maybe he’ll go back to the University of Calgary, which is pretty much the same thing.

Meanwhile, one imagines Premier Stelmach, an honourable guy who had a harder time as premier than he really deserved, is pretty pleased with the outcome of last night’s vote.

This post also appears on Rabble.ca.

6 Comments on "The ‘Freddy Lee’ Loser Factor: Albertans plain didn’t like a sneak"

  1. joannis says:

    I could have written everything you said but for one little detail which is why i'm a conservative and your not. Danielle Smith is not interested in canonizing Morton. That was a silly thing to suggest. First of all she solidifies her leadership over him by NOT canonizing him. Secondly, even Danielle Smith has wisely shown, like Preston Manning, that she is a populist who wants expatriot liberals and NDP to join her….she has said as much. But you wrote a great article. Thanks I enjoyed thinking of Stelmach having a little chuckle over this one. Though I don't think he'd chuckle too much over giving the party helm to Gary Scheister Mar. After all Stelmach IS a conservative and Mar is a classic Grit! You can bet that Stelmach wishes Horner better "get cracking" and selling those memberships! He's not going to like Alison Redford anymore with all her nasty zingers about his search for a legacy-send-off, whatever you want to call it. I don't begrudge Stelmach's intent; i also agree history will be far kinder to Stelmach than it will be to Morton.

  2. Anonymous says:

    Joannis – thanks for the chuckle :-) Mar is a grit? NDP and liberals voting for Wildrose? Best I've heard in a while.

  3. David J. Climenhaga says:

    Joannis and I will have to agree to disagree for the moment about how the Wildrose Party will try to portray Dr. Morton, but I chuckled too at Joannis's portrayal of Mr. Mar as a classic Grit. In my case, however, it was a chuckle of agreement. I think this is a very apt description and not necessarily an insult. Canadian Liberals, after all, tried and succeeded for years to build the biggest big tent of all, and I suspect that is exactly what Mr. Mar would try to do as Conservative leader. More on this in a future post.

  4. Sam Gunsch says:

    Alternate speculation about factors beyond 'sneak' that undermined Morton's campaign:

    First: Morton lost voters who have switched to Wildrose because they believe the land-use legislation threatens property rights. Second, Morton lost voters to Orman, who agrees with the property rights attack on the land use legislation Morton continues to champion. Third, re sneak: Morton had very few votes to lose from whatever percentage of the PC base engaged in this leadership race that actually thinks transparency is a political virture. I think Morton supporters would not be surprised or care much about emails, because Morton's been pretty open about his political method philosophy through the years: i.e., successful politics don't rely much on candid and forthright communication. Politics is whatever-it-takes hardball.

    re Morton seeking greener pastures:
    Alberta has too much to offer to Morton and Orman and like-minded market utopians… stuff like Rick Bell writes about here: http://www.edmontonsun.com/2011/09/17/the-right-stuff

    My guess…remaining engaged in Alberta as an insider to contribute to the long game outweighs short-term personal setbacks. And that it's easier to be a big fish in a small pond also applies.

    Sam Gunsch

  5. Carlos Beca says:

    Mar a classic Liberal? I have serious doubts about that. I would agree if you said that of Alison Redford.
    What is amazing about all of this is that no one is talking about the democratic deficit. It seems we have gotten used to be a democratic joke. The premier of this province is being elected by 60 thousand voters. Really astonishing to me anyway. The other 3 and half million just have to put up with this and do not even realize the absurd of this process or this system. Of all the parties running none seems to be disturbed by this.
    Anonymous is going to reply calling me a pessimist again :) Yes my friend I find this real process offensive, disgusting and very dictatorial. I am sorry, nothing optimnistic about this. I have to now live with whatever decisions this premier elected by 60 thousand Albertans decides to do including the possibility of the privatization of the Health Care system like he has already suggested. Should I be optimistic about this?

  6. Andy says:

    Alberta political parties are now realigned.

    The rest of Canada would not recognize them; the Progressive Conservatives would pass as Liberals in most provinces, the Wildrose as Conservatives, and the Alberta Liberals are an enigma. nobody can figure out.

    Only the ND's continue to live the socialist dream in all provinces.

    November election anyone?

Comment