Harper Conservative response to NDP seems delusional – and apparently ineffective

The Conservative Party’s Parliamentary brain trust figures out how to respond to Opposition Leader Thomas Mulcair during Question Period. Below: Nik Nanos.

No one should be particularly shocked that yelps of protest by western premiers and Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s Conservatives in Ottawa have failed to dent support for the Opposition New Democrats after they dared speak the evident truth about the economic impact of Canada’s muscular petro-Loonie.

Indeed, according a reasonable analysis of the Nanos Research poll published yesterday by the Globe and Mail, screeches by various conservatives may have even helped Opposition Leader Thomas Mulcair and the NDP Opposition.

In an interview with iPolitics, pollster Nik Nanos suggested Mr. Mulcair’s original reference to the effects of “Dutch Disease” on the Canadian economy was no gaffe – as repeatedly claimed by mainstream media commentators playing the role of the PM’s Greek chorus – but “should be seen as part of a longer-term plan that has broken the NDP’s strategic mold.”

Mr. Nanos argued in the interview that while the NDP once tried consistently to appeal to a broad range of Canadians, now Mr. Mulcair “seems ready to ‘take a page from Harper’ and focus on segments that he has a chance to bring on side.” In other words, practice wedge politics.

Well, it could be. New Democrats certainly chose Mr. Mulcair as someone who would play politics like a grownup. But it may also be simply that the Harper Conservative strategy on this issue to date has been so laughably crude most Canadians see right through it.

Given the astonishing lack of sophistication of the recent Conservative attacks in the House of Commons, Canadians may, in fact, find Mr. Mulcair’s plain talk refreshing!

Meanwhile, voters outside the two main petro-provinces may actually see the hysterical response by these Prairie conservatives as evidence of their self-interest, and indeed as affirmation of Mr. Mulcair’s arguments.

Really, it takes a lot of brass for the Harper Cons to claim their main opponent is dividing the country by stating an observation that makes eminent sense to Canadians in every part of Canada except those corners of the Prairies awash in petro-cash. This is especially so when the Conservatives are running the most openly divisive government in Canadian history.

As has been said before in this space, the severity of the problem can be disputed, as can the best solution, but acknowledgement of the impact of oilsands development on the dollar, or the strength of the dollar on the country’s manufacturing sector, is apparent to anyone with a rudimentary understanding of economics or a hankering to travel to the United States.

Moreover, instead of just sticking to this factually wrong but faintly plausible storyline, the Harper Government’s claims have grown more delirious by the day.

Mr. Mulcair calls oil patch workers themselves a disease, some Tory claims without a shred of evidence. Mr. Mulcair has a specific date in mind to close down Alberta’s bitumen sands, another one chimes in, failing to provide a hint of substantiation.

Where do they get this stuff? Does anyone believe them? (Other than the plethora of conservative commentators in the mainstream media, that is.)

Never mind Dutch Disease, the Tories apparently make stuff up out of whole cloth on any topic.

When Mr. Mulcair asked a Question in the House Thursday about the prime minister’s unexpected ramblings about the shortness of the European runway if neo-Con economic bromides are not adopted with alacrity, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty responded by pretending the Opposition leader wants to give money to the Europeans.

Since there’s no evidence whatsoever Mr. Mulcair ever said any such thing, presumably the finance minister just made it up.

We ought not to be too smug about this. Eventually, the deep-pocketed Harperites will turn responsibility for sliming Mr. Mulcair and the NDP over to their highly competent propaganda professionals, and the results will be neither pretty nor ineffective.

The form the NDP response takes will tell the story of how successful the Tory onslaught proves to be.

But for the moment, watching the supposedly cunning and devious Harper Conservatives unravel into pathological delusions and pathetically transparent fantasies is a highly salutary experience.

This post also appears on Rabble.ca.

4 Comments on "Harper Conservative response to NDP seems delusional – and apparently ineffective"

  1. Alex P says:

    And yet, our totally unifying Prime Minister seems to be running a war on Human Rights Commissions. Bill C-304: Hate Speech Clause's Repeal Gives White Supremacists Rare Moment Of Glee Ooooo… they hates them those Human Rights Commissions.

    That's one very sharp wedge. (I wish HuffPoCan had credited that photo of what jubilant skin heads might look like. Or just omitted it.) The public hopefully remember the long campaigns against Stephane Dion and Michael Ignattief. In such a case, would the obvious defence (applied vigorously and consistently) be to point out the similarities? I'm rubber; you're a douche canoe?

  2. jean chicoine says:

    Man, I'll be happy when Harper's Conservatives are booted out of the House of Commons. They're a shame.
    When I read Elizabeth May's point of order on C-38 I thought: Now, that's what an MP is all about! She showed intelligence and rationality. She along with her team had done the research. That's what the HoC should look like: intelligent debate, not the schoolyard bullying that Harper's Conservatives are displaying.

  3. Anonymous says:

    Thank you!
    I knew there were writers like you in Alberta – I just hadn't read their words in a while.
    Fan in BC ~

  4. fubar says:

    Not all that familiar with the whole 'Dutch Disease' thingy. Don't care that much either. If you have to couch your talking points in politico speak you have lost a large portion of the voting electorate.

    That being said, Mulcair has a valid point on the sustainability of the oil/tar sands (you pick your poison). And Premier Redford has already gone there on the 'national energy stateregy' thingamabob (whatever it is). He can certainly start a rational discussion on this, but I am not certain it won't devolve into right wing screeching (prove me wrong).

    As to what this has done to the NDP's share of the so called vote, the jury is still out until next election time. BUT, and it is a big BUT, he has already captured a lot of the soft Liberal voters. And may get a lot more if Harper keeps up as he has. The CPC will never get more then they did last election, only reason they won is because of first past the poll math. If they NDP go fire and brimstone (and make a credible argument), Harper and the gang will be relegated to the prairies.

    And the next PM is…………Mulcair. You heard it here first.

Comment