Since she won’t apologize for remarks made by one of her candidates during the recent election campaign that many Albertans thought were offensive and anti-gay, Wildrose Party Leader Danielle Smith found herself trapped this week between a rock and a hard place.
The leader of Alberta’s Opposition party desperately wants to leave behind the brouhaha created by unsuccessful Edmonton-South West candidate Alan Hunsperger, who imprudently left a blog post lying around the Internet before last April’s election that expressed the view all gays are doomed to spend eternity in the Lake of Fire if they don’t repent.
To do so, Ms. Smith tried Tuesday to “mend fences,” in the words of a local newspaper, with Alberta’s gay community by attending the Edmonton Pride Festival Police Chief’s Reception, a low-key event that involved the kind of imagery the Wildrose Party is comfortable with – squad cars and people in uniform.
But members of the gay community, including some of the police officers at the reception, continue to make it clear they expect her to apologize for the remarks made by Pastor Hunsperger, who is a minister in a conservative Protestant congregation that holds homosexuality to be a violation of God’s law and apparently spends lot of time agonizing about it.
Ms. Smith refuses to say she’s sorry, insisting that to do so would amount to an attack on Pastor Hunsperger’s freedom of speech and religion.
As a result, the issue won’t go away, creaking like a rusty hinge every time Ms. Smith opens the gate in that fence she’s trying to mend – to the absolute delight of the Progressive Conservative Party of Premier Alison Redford, who used the original controversy to derail the Wildrose campaign days before the April 23 election.
So on Tuesday, Ms. Smith tried to sidestep the question of an apology by telling reporters that if anyone wants atonement for Pastor Hunsperger’s remarks, they’ll have to go to Pastor Hunsperger. “I think it’s important for us to have the conversation about religious freedom, freedom of speech and equality rights, because I think that’s really what this comes down to,” she extemporized, according to the Edmonton Journal.
As is often the case when the political right starts letting off steam about our fundamental freedoms, though, this issue isn’t really about freedom of speech or religion at all.
Virtually all Albertans agree with Ms. Smith that Pastor Hunsperger has a fundamental right to believe anything he chooses is sinful. As we know, there enough sins in the Old Testament of the Bible to consign us all to the lake of fire – apparently including wearing a wool suit with a linen collar! (Leviticus 19:19.)
The question is really whether holding those views and talking publicly about them in a casual and hurtful way made Pastor Hunsperger an appropriate candidate for the party, and whether his doing so indicated the party holds homophobic views – which, obviously, is precisely what a lot of Albertans concluded.
Imagine if the bee in Pastor Hunsperger’s theological bonnet had been that members of some other branch of Christianity – say, Catholics, or Baptists – were sinners bound for Hell. Would Ms. Smith be prepared then to apologize to the Catholics, or the Baptists, to save her electoral skin? Of course she would!
As a matter of fact, quite a lot of Christians hold exactly such views. Consider the
controversy in the United States among evangelical Christians about the Mormon beliefs of Republican candidate Mitt Romney, which are presumably the same as those held by Wildrose House Leader Rob Anderson. And it’s certainly consistent with Christian theology to believe non-Christians are bound for an unhappy eternal destination.
But you can count on it that supporters of a right-wing party like the Wildrose would never have gotten their knickers in a twist about that they way they have about homosexuality. It’s reasonable of us to ask why.
What’s more, almost all the Christians associated with parties of the right like Ms. Smith’s seem completely disengaged from many of the teachings of the nominal head of their church. For example, “And again I say unto you, It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle, than for a rich man to enter into the kingdom of God.” (Matthew 19:24.) If that’s not a clarion call for fair progressive taxation as a social good, in this world and the next, I don’t know what is!
Verily, verily, I say unto thee, the real reason for Ms. Smith’s predicament – and for her reluctance to say she’s sorry – is her party’s practice of wedge politics, not freedom of religion.
The Wildrose Party embarked on a strategy of wedge politics designed to separate groups of voters traditionally associated with Ms. Redford’s PC Party and drive them toward Wildrose candidates. For a time, at least until the discovery of Pastor Hunsperger’s Epistle to the Albertans, it seemed to be working spectacularly.
One of the groups they tried to appeal to was religious fundamentalists with strongly hostile views about sexual minorities.
The problem now faced by Ms. Smith, who I am sure is not personally homophobic, is that she can’t say sorry to the gay community without infuriating a significant portion of her party’s most loyal base, religious fundamentalists so carefully and discreetly cultivated before and during the election campaign.
It is said here Wildrose opposition to public payments for gender reassignment surgery, another sore point with the same community, is mud from the same muddy spring.
That’s the thing about wedge politics. It’s a two-edged sword, and sometimes it cuts on the side its wielder didn’t intend it to!
This must be very frustrating to a market fundamentalist like Ms. Smith who really, one strongly suspects, doesn’t care a fig about fundamental religious issues.
But it’s pretty hard to feel much sympathy for her predicament. She got herself there. Now she’s going to have to get herself out.
It seems like Pastor Hunsperger won’t be much help in that endeavour.
This post also appears on Rabble.ca.



Why would Smith apologize for something she thinks is true? She fully supports homophobic Hunsperger n his beliefs. She found out the hard way most Albertans don't.
Danielle Smith at this point has painted herself into a corner. Wildrose had a degree of success despite, or because, some segment of Alberta voters agree or feel comfortable with views like Pastor Hunsperger's. His loss in Edmonton-South West none the less cemented the idea that Danielle's team will stand up for your right to vote for heaven above all.
This might fade from memory, unless Lake of Fire t-shirts become the hottest new trend in town. In a few years, maybe.
At this point, we should all meditate on the Pennsylvania Amish. The state forgoes the requirement for drivers licences and post warning signs on highways. For their part. the Amish put reflectors on their buggies. The Amish do no shoot at passing cars. They continue to help neighbours in need (even the car driving ones.)
Personally, my path to heaven, or final oblivion, does not depend pushing anyone out of the way.
Despite the fact that David does not seem to believe that Danielle Smith is homophobic I totally agree with Anonymous on this one. Why should she apologize for something she thinks it is true? I also believe that she is surprised with what most Albertans believe in and like Alex says, she has cornered herself big time. I for one am very happy she did and I think she will be in trouble with this issue for a long time. Again I certainly hope she does. She will have the same situation with other issues as well.
"Of course she would!"
You're sure of that are you David? If you can read minds and impute motives, why are you wasting your time blogging?
I know Danielle Smith, and I know that she is a true Libertarian – a most unfortunate conviction for a politician expected to participate in whatever mob psychosis is the flavour of the day. I doubt that her integrity was the principal cause of Wildrose's failure to make deeper inroads but, it surely didn't help.
I have to smile at the bigotry of those who have convinced themselves that Wildrose appeals only to a "base" of evangelical Christians. (Caution, anecdotal statement to follow): I have lunch every Monday with half a dozen engineers of whom all but one are atheists. (The odd man out is a Lutheran). Every one of us not only voted Wildrose but supported the party financially. Hmmmm