The message from worried Canadians, in and out of uniform, to former Frank publisher Michael Bate. Below: Frank’s semi-iconic logo, Mr. Bate, a typical Frank cover from the Paul Martin era.
TORONTO
If you’re a Canadian politician, you should be afraid, very afraid.
Frank Magazine will soon be back… Or so it’s rumoured and so we fervently hope.
The last Canadians heard officially from former Frank editor and publisher Michael Bate, back in 2010, was that he’d “morphed into a Canadian composer.” Like, of music.
This was disheartening news. I don’t care if the guy is Charlie Flippin’ Parker, what our country needs is his ability to spin hilarious yarns, not to make music with a steel guitar and a mouth harp or even a battered old anglo-saxophone.
Back in 2008, Mr. Bate pulled the plug on his venerable effort to keep Canadian politicians (and labour leaders, and media meat puppets, and senior bureaucratic elflords … no one was safe) honest. It wasn’t making money any more, he said at the time, and was no longer in tune with the zeitgeist of the era.
The publication was usually described as “a satirical magazine” or “a Parliamentary tip-sheet,” either of which goes only part of the way to explaining the Frank phenomenon, and neither of which does the concept justice. It wasn’t just that Frank was scurrilous, it was that under Mr. Bate’s editorial hand it was scurrilous, laugh-out-loud funny and in possession of an unerring sense of where to strike to inflict maximum damage to deserving targets.
No one was safe – even former Frank contributors. All of the aforementioned categories of subject matter despised it, and prime minister Brian Mulroney was said to have a particular loathing for the publication, probably because of a contest thought up by Mr. Bate about who would deflower the then PM’s daughter.
Offensive, yes, but funny too given the way Mr. Mulroney was shamelessly using the lass to assist with his campaigning. There was also a regular feature, purportedly a diary written by Mr. Mulroney’s beloved wife Mila, known to Frankistes as “Imelda,” that was either a brilliant parody or really was written by Mila Mulroney!
Frank’s Remedial Media column was loved and hated in newsrooms across the land – loved by hard-pressed “sluggos,” that is, hated by the managers who made their lives a misery, a class of people who were notoriously unwilling to let anyone fearlessly report the media’s own foibles.
House o’ Labour happily skewered unions, specifically the people who ran them. But I’m sure there’d also be room under the general heading for the likes of the union-hating foes and their coruscating legalists. Now and again, as I recall, Frank would even go after the clergy. Identifying hypocrisy and cowardice among the puffed-up and self-righteous was Frank’s stock in trade, after all, and with Mr. Bate at the helm, no publication did better.
Loosely based on Britain’s Private Eye magazine – although Mr. Bate’s Canadian publication was always far funnier, at least from any vantage point on this side of the Atlantic Ocean, if as badly printed – Frank provided the useful function of a place where any unauthorized report from inside the Parliamentary Bunker or its environs could see the light of day. This was true no matter how shabbily researched the piece might be, but what the hey!
Just the same, often a week or two after a Frank report, a shamefaced little unattributed item could be counted on to show up saying pretty much the same thing in the pages of the Globe and Mail or the Toronto Star.
Another staple was the Frank Prank, in which Parliamentarians and media had the opportunity to prove just how dumb they were, or, occasionally, weren’t. Case in point: In 2007, the Canadian Magazines blog reports, Frank fooled everyone by setting up a completely bogus support group for Conrad Black, then facing legal troubles in the United States.
Lord Black is now happily back in the land of his birth if not of his citizenship, so that function has been taken over by his Lordship’s Sherpas in the stenography department of the National Post and in the Harper cabinet. “I am again flattered by such a thing. I will give you all CONRAD WILL WIN shirts when you are here,” Lord Black is said to have written “Alistair Smith,” who, naturally, turned out to be Mr. Bate.
And speaking of his Lordship, who can forget Conrad’s Prison Diary, another product of the same imagination that gave us the Diary of Mo and Mila (Mo being Maureen McTeer) and the musings of Royal Canadian Legionnaire Dick Little. (Aesthete’s Diary in the early nineties is said to have been penned by none other than Michael Coren!)
Frank had its own private argot: men with balding pates were known as slapheads, over-enthusiastic authors of press releases risked being known as “wind therapists,” those rare journalists who actually did work were inevitably “sluggos,” government media spokesthingies were labelled “fart catchers,” broadcasters were “bingo callers” or “sock puppets,” bullying corporatists “obbergruppenfuhreren.” Drink too much and Frank might record your more “moist and garrulous” moments. And all that’s without even getting into details of what Canada’s notorious stickmen, avid pianists, flautists, ardent heterosexualists and the like might be getting up to.
Frank was founded in 1987 in Halifax, and a Halifax edition still exists. The Bluenose edition was published separately throughout the interregnum, never made any sense and still doesn’t. (It can be found at Frankmagazine.ca if you don’t believe me.) The two totally different editions shared a masthead and logo at least part of that time.
Mr. Bate’s “Central Canadian Edition” started publication two years later and managed to survive until its majority. It wasn’t run by Mr. Bate throughout that time, however, and therein lay a significant part of its problem, which it is said here was not so much with the zeitgeist but the fact the fellow who bought it from Mr. Bate and tried to run it for a spell in the early Zeroes just wasn’t very funny. Apparently he wanted to take it upscale. Well, that couldn’t be done, and it ought not to have been tried.
Now the rumour mill has it that Mr. Bate hopes to re-launch this important Canadian institution quite soon, possibly later this year. With the Globe in Mail a pathetic shadow of its former self, a revivified Frank would be a worthy challenger for the title “Canada’s National Newspaper.”
And if the zeitgeist isn’t right for Frank Magazine now – with Stephen Harper pulling the electoral levers behind the green curtain in Ottawa, the media reduced to flotsam by the reefs if the Internet and a separatist party back in power in Quebec City – well, Canadian civilization as we know it has already come to an end!
This is our nation’s hour of need. Your country calls you, Frank! You too, Bate!
This post also appears on Rabble.ca.



Praise be to the satire lord. It’s tough out here for us unworthy bloggers being the only line in the sand for journos to cross. They don’t give a shit about us because the media has become too all-powerful. If there ever was a time that Frank was needed it is now. The anti-G&M? Shit, the anti-Post, anti-Sun, anti-CTV, anti-Global.
Am I dreaming? Canada is all the poorer for not have a fearless counterpoint to the 90 percenter Conservative media. I am probably dreaming because the return of Frank, according to your post, is sketchy and sounding a little like a promise that won’t be kept. No worries; just the thought of Frank returning is almost enough.
I’ve never read the Central Canada version of frank, but have read many issues of its Atlantic Canada counterpart and found them (at least until recently) to perform a similarly useful function to what you’ve laid out here. I don’t know what has happened lately but its become quite terrible.
TO RONMAC, who wrote of the possibility of Frank returning, as “excellent news,” and explained that he hoped Frank would have the courage to look into Canada’s most famously rumoured Parliamentary family bustup, I feel I owe an explanation of why I have not allowed his comment, just now, anyway. In three words: I am a coward.
This is much the same reason, by the way, that the mainstream media have refused to cover the story, except that they’ll never come right out and admit their cowardice.
The difference, I would suggest to Ronmac and to the rest of you is that I am just me, without the cover of a corporate structure and its deep pockets and corporate lawyers. I simply cannot afford to take the chances that they can. Nor can I do the research they are capable of, to confirm the facts, if any. Moreover, I have had the experience of being sued for something I wrote when I was without such corporate protections (completely without justification, I might add) and it was not a pleasant experience. I agree totally that this is an important story, notwithstanding its personal nature, and it is a disgrace that the mainstream media have not addressed it.
This is so, by the way, even if it is completely untrue, since the rumour is now so widespread, so frequently repeated over such a long period of time (since December 2010) and is so consistent in its details that it deserves to be answered once and for all.
How well known? How broadly repeated? Well, Ronmac quotes the irritating Andrew Cohen, writing in his Ottawa Citizen blog, thusly: “In Ottawa, tongues have been wagging for two years about trouble in one political marriage. One of the partners is now said to have left the nest. It hasn’t made the newspapers, at least not yet.”
I’m afraid I’m going to have to leave it at that for the moment.
I will promise Ronmac this, however: If I can ever find a source I have confidence in that can conform this story, I will print it. This seems unlikely, though, seeing as I’m just little old me without the resources of the Vulcan Advocate, let alone those of the Globe and Mail or the Toronto Star!
That’s cool. Actually it was the Globe and Mail comments sections not long ago where I learned about this.
Shocked, I googled it and found lots on the subject. My first reaction was to dismiss it as just another rumor (as my mother used to say, “You hear so many queer stories you don`t know what to believe anymore.”)
But there some respectable sources like Norman Spector (Brian Mulroney chief of staff and former ambassador to Israel) who claims he had these rumors confirmed by insiders on the hill and tried raising the issue in a blog post only to have it squelched by the Globe and Mail.
A widespread rumor? Several people I told were shocked. Never heard it before. (discovered an ugly truth about myself, enjoyed being a dispenser of gossip)
One person (who happened to be gay) blurted out, “No! I don`t believe that. I want to believe it!”
But after letting the matter settle and analyzing how the major media outlets are controlled by friends of Harper, yeah, he could see how something like this would be buried.
BTW anyone out there just itching to find out more just shoot me an email. I accept Visa and Mastercard.
I’ve seen that rumour which was quite widespread before Dec 2010 I think, but at least one journalist pointed out that if there had been anything to it, someone would have found some evidence by now. That is, it would be a scoop for anyone who could back it up. And I think Cohen and Spector were the only ones to mention it in public, neither of them providing any backup.
Perhaps we need a more sure thing more than the promise of the return of Frank. What do you think David? Hint, hint.