Despite plans to reopen next week, ripples from XL Foods closing may spread

Everything from ranches to feedlots to auction operations not quite like this one could be affected by a financial disaster at Nilsson Brothers Inc., the owner of XL Foods in Brooks.

With reports yesterday the XL Foods meatpacking plant in Brooks is likely to reopen in a week, media attention is bound to shift back to the schedule on which full production will resume under whatever management team now gets to run the slaughterhouse.

But potential fallout from the E. coli crisis at XL Foods and the surprise sale of the company to a giant Brazilian meatpacking corporation could turn out to be more severe for farmers, workers and the provincial economy than just a month-long shutdown of beef processing at Canada’s second-largest meatpacker would suggest, and problems won’t necessarily be avoided by the plant’s acquisition by a new owner.

If Nilsson Brothers Inc., the privately owned corporate parent of XL Foods, continues to be heavily invested in agricultural land, ranching operations, feedlots and auction houses, and if it also remains financially on the hook for the disaster in Brooks, serious implications could spread far and wide through the rural Alberta economy.

The problem is, we can’t really know because as privately owned companies, XL Foods and Nilsson Brothers are able to make decisions in almost total secrecy based on knowledge only available to a small circle of insiders – even though both provincial and federal taxpayers have been putting money into their operations.

Many Alberta stakeholders – including most of our politicians, in all likelihood – are just passengers on this ocean liner and those white things we see in the mist may or may not be icebergs. Meanwhile, we are advised only to not be alarmed and to cook our beef thoroughly.

The announcement last week by the U.S. subsidiary of JBS SA of Sao Paulo, Brazil, that its managers were immediately taking over running the problem-plagued XL Foods plant in Brooks and that it had an option to purchase the facility for $100 million US half in cash and half in shares, raises significant questions to which Albertans deserve answers.

Did Nilsson Brothers clear their unexpected plan to sell off the Brooks packing plant to JBS USA with the people and businesses to whom they owe financial obligations?

As has been said in this space before, it seems highly improbable Nilsson Brothers made its multi-million-dollar investments in XL Foods without silent business partners to backstop the deal. If the Nilssons did not clear their plan with their creditors and if they have not cut the links between XL and their other holdings, it is hard to imagine how their company can survive.

If it doesn’t, what happens to its other operations?

In other words, this could have a much bigger impact on the Alberta cattle trade than the actual packinghouse problems in Brooks because the Nilssons are so horizontally extended into feedlots, ranches, auction services and cattle financing from their modest headquarters on St. Albert Trail in Edmonton.

JBS, as readers will recall, stated unequivocally in its news release announcing the manage-to-purchase scheme that there is no way it will be responsible for any of XL Foods liabilities, debts or penalties.

Moreover, how to we explain the 25-per-cent interest rate given to XL Foods by HSBC Bank Canada and reported by the Edmonton Journal in a good story on this situation published on Oct. 18?

To buy the Brooks plant, according to the Journal, “a consortium of lenders headed by HSBC Bank Canada gave XL Foods a $225-million line of credit at an interest rate of 25 per cent. In addition, the Nilsson brothers used their 75,000-head feedlot operation and other lands near Brooks as collateral on an $18-million mortgage from Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. and a $20-million loan from the Bank of Nova Scotia, the latter at a rate of prime plus 10 percentage points.”

On its face, the high interest rate suggests the bank believes the company’s position was shaky from the get-go. If that is so, we have to assume the bankers’ consortium protected itself from circumstances like those that have now unfolded. Will the lenders try to take over these assets? You have to admit, this would hardly be atypical behaviour for bankers. If so, what will they do with them? What will happen to unsecured creditors?

Count on it that JBS is already negotiating with XL Foods’ secured creditors to find out how little the Brazilian company can pay for its new Alberta assets. That means that many of the numbers that have been reported may not turn out to be anything at all like the final details of the deal, and that deal may not be very favourable to the Nilssons.

Well, you may say, this is just a problem for a bunch of businessmen, boring members of the 1 per cent. But not really. Albertans and other Canadians have a stake in XL Foods in the sense both federal and provincial taxpayers have been putting grant money into its operations.

While the Nilssons were using our money to improve their massive facility in Brooks – the one that now appears likely to end up in Brazilian hands – they were closing two plants in Calgary, another in Moose Jaw and yet another in the United States.

No doubt taxpayers will have to pay for the fallout from those closings too, at least the ones in Canada.

Nothing unusual about this, of course. There has been a parade over the years of fast guns in the Alberta meat-packing industry, helped out by taxpayers and sadly unsuccessful in a difficult business. Who can forget what Peter Pocklington was doing when he wasn’t making Edmonton hockey fans unhappy?

When they mess up, as businesses do with regularity, taxpayers often get to pick up the pieces.

So the most important question, it would seem to me, is this: What are we getting for our investment?

This post also appears on Rabble.ca.

2 Comments on "Despite plans to reopen next week, ripples from XL Foods closing may spread"

  1. Determinator says:

    5 years ago (2007) Ranchers Beef also had an e coli situation. Perhaps it was less news worthy at the time as the company had ceased operations before the outbreak was observed.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2007/10/26/us-beef-ecoli-idUSN2641054820071026

  2. Last Chance Ranch says:

    Just looking for the artists name for the picture at the top. I would like get a copy.

Comment