A Tale of Two Provinces: B.C. NDP and Wild Rosehip Tea Party show why opposition matters

Razzle-dazzle, sis-boom-bah, balanced budgets, rah-rah-rah! Danielle Smith and the Wild Rosehip Tea Party yell squad cheers for Alison Redford’s Tory team’s worst plays on the field. The actual Alberta opposition may not be quite as illustrated. Below: Ms. Redford and B.C. Premier Christie Clark. Why are these two premiers smiling?

British Columbia and Alberta, Canada’s two westernmost provinces, have lots in common.

Both have economies that rely heavily on volatile natural resources, well-educated, diverse and generally socially progressive populations, and Westminster-style parliamentary legislatures in beautiful old buildings.

Both are also governed by irresponsible neoconservative coalitions with misleading names that have been in power far too long, each of which has an obsession with balanced budgets and also faces a problem balancing the darned things.

The B.C. neoconservatives are called Liberals and are led by Premier Christy Clark. The Alberta neoconservatives are called Progressive Conservatives and are led by Premier Alison Redford. Apparently Ms. Clark and Ms. Redford can’t stand one another, owing to Ms. Clark’s refusal to commit political suicide to help Ms. Redford – but that will have to be a topic for another day.

There are big differences, too, of course, and I’m not just talking about the West Coast weather forecast.

Chief among them in the political arena is that there’s an opposition party in the B.C. Legislature. It’s called the New Democratic Party led by a fellow named Adrian Dix and we’re told it could very well win the next provincial general election that’s now just 12 weeks away, God willing and the crick don’t rise.

Hoist on its own petard, the B.C. Liberals must hold the election on May 14, thanks to the party’s own un-Canadian fixed-election-date legislation. The reliably neoconservative Vancouver Sun begged yesterday for the vote to be pushed back to a more convenient date, say, one when there’s a more popular neocon premier at the helm.

Here in Alberta, by contrast, we have for an “opposition” one of the offshoots of the American Tea Party – which I like to think of as the Wild Rosehip Tea Party – which acts as a cheerleading section for all the worst instincts of the governing party, the unprogressive Progressive Conservatives of Premier Alison Redford.

The Wild Rosehipsters, officially known as the Wildrose Party, are led by Danielle Smith, who used to be an intern for the Vancouver-based Fraser Institute. They believe in everything the PC Party led by Ms. Redford does, and more! Woo-hoo!

This difference is important because while the New Democratic Party in B.C. most certainly acts as a brake on the worst instincts of the neoconservative B.C. Liberals, and occasionally even pushes them in the right direction, which is the left direction, the Wild Rosehip Tea Party in Alberta always pushes the neoliberal Conservative Party in the wrong direction, which is to say politically speaking the right direction.

Still with me? I’m trying to make a serious point here.

We saw examples of this yesterday in both provinces.

In British Columbia, pushed by the NDP, Ms. Clark’s neoconservative Liberals tabled a budget that, while rich in flaws, did at least one sensible thing – to wit, it included a modest increase in business taxes to help the government meet its commitments.

The mainstream media in B.C. was crowing with delight at how the Liberals had outmaneuvered the NDP, who have been calling for a similar tax increase. (Ms. Clark also sort of outmaneuvered Ms. Redford, by actually managing to put together a budget she could claim, however fancifully, to be balanced.)

The B.C. Liberal budget, which also included a modest (and temporary) increase in income taxes among higher income earners, “captures some of the political territory that has long been occupied by the New Democratic Party opposition, by turning to corporations … to help put the budget back into black,” raved the Toronto Globe and Mail.

Personally, I think this sells B.C. voters short. Those who support a more sensible and sustainable taxation policy have to know that these increases will be out the window the instant the Liberals manage to squeak back into power, if they do, and will likely behave accordingly in the polling booth. Regardless of that, we’ll presumably know soon enough.

Meanwhile, back here in Alberta, we were having a holy-cowflops moment yesterday with the realization the latest analysis of the government’s resource-dependent revenue misestimates mean the looming budget deficit could be as high as $4 billion.

Since Ralph Klein was premier, the province has made an obsession of avoiding both tax increases and deficits, no matter the cost in crumbling infrastructure or flagging services. As a result, the Richest Place on Earth ™ exists in a perpetual state of economic crisis, and this entirely self-inflicted injury now has the potential to become a major embarrassment for Ms. Redford.

But with the Wild Rosehip Tea Party pulling the whistle cord and sitting in the driver’s seat of the province’s ideological locomotive, there’s absolutely no danger we’ll smooth out the wild fluctuations in resource prices with the application of sensibly progressive taxes.

Hell no! We’ll drive this train right off the bridge if we have to before we’ll raise the lowest business taxes in the country by even a single percentage point or give up our “flat tax” – ensuring that more cash can all head south across the U.S. border in the form of massive corporate profits. And when it comes to petroleum royalties, we won’t even collect the money we say we’re owed!

So yesterday we had the unedifying spectacle of Finance Minister Doug Horner getting up on his hind legs and telling us that public service managers were going to have a haircut, and anyone who is negotiating a collective agreement with the public sector – which is pretty well all the public employees in the province – had better get ready for a trim as well.

Remember, these public employees are in many cases the very same naïve voters who flocked to the PCs’ side last April to keep the WRTP out of power, thereby saving the government’s sorry keester in its darkest hour.

If nothing else, this should tell us all we need to know about the importance of having the right opposition here in Alberta.

If we had Adrian Dix and the B.C. NDP as the opposition, we could probably expect Ms. Redford’s Progressive Conservatives to behave like grownups. Hell, that might even be true if we have Brian Mason and his Alberta NDP as opposition.

Instead we have the Wild Rosehipsters and so the government’s key strategy is to sell out the people who saved it and reward the people who came very close to destroying it, and who furthermore still want to.

What’s wrong with this picture?

+ + +

Fort Mac Public School Board nixes four-day week plan

This just in: Pressed by mostly horrified parents, Fort McMurray’s Public School Board voted late yesterday against adopting a four-day school week to save $1-million.

The scheme would have increased the average school day by 11 minutes and cut classes for students on about half of the school year’s Fridays to help reduce the board’s $4.4-million deficit.

Most educators criticized the proposal as harmful to learning, although as this blog’s mailbag showed, the idea had some fervent supporters.

This post also appears on Rabble.ca.

2 Comments on "A Tale of Two Provinces: B.C. NDP and Wild Rosehip Tea Party show why opposition matters"

  1. Mark McCourt says:

    The PCs beat Wildrose last year by about 124,000 votes, about the same number that the Liberals lost compared with the previous election. In short, had those traditionally Liberal voters not abandoned base camp to “strategically” vote PC, the Liberals would likely have at least twice as many seats and be holding the balance of power in Alberta’s first ever minority government legislature.
    The NDP is typically quite content with 10% of the popular vote and a caucus that fits in a compact car, but if the Liberal and Alberta parties want to leave the lovable loser division and actually compete for a shot at the title in 2016, it’s time to trash the toxic Liberal name and merge under the Alberta party banner.

  2. Alvin Finkel says:

    A Liberal Party merger with the AP, which got almost no votes, won’t remove the view of voters in most seats that their two real choices are the Tories and Wildrose. A Liberal-NDP coaltion after the 2008 vote would have prevented Wildrose from getting anywhere because, as Tom Flanagan has observed, oil companies in AB felt that it was OK to split the right-wing vote since the left-wing vote was already split and the two-peas-in-a-pod AB Liberals and NDP fight each other, not the Right. As Calgary Liberal MLA Kent Hehr notes, he can barely find the differences between the platform he ran on as a Liberal and what the NDP were running on, and when Rachel Notley speaks in the legislature, he always agrees with every word. There’s only so much wrong with Albertans. But there’s lots wrong with their centre-left parties. It probably won’t get fixed and we’ll get a Wild Rose government in 2016.

Comment